By Amir Zia
Monthly Newsline
July 2018
PPP critics predict some nasty surprises for the party in the 2018 elections, but given the track record and the absence of an effective leadership within the opposition, it is likely to win Sindh for the third time in a row, albeit with a slashed number of seats.
Who
will be the overall frontrunner in the 2018 general elections from Sindh? The
answer to this question is obvious – the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP). Despite
all the allegations of corruption and grievances against a decade of poor
governance and misrule, the PPP seems in control of the electoral battlefield
of Sindh — its traditional stronghold.
It is
not just the Bhutto name that still casts its spell; the dominance of the PPP
in the second-tier cities and rural parts of Sindh is also due to the fact that
there appears to be no effective alternate leadership to pose a serious
challenge to the party.
The
entry of Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, PPP’s young chairman, in the electoral field
for the first time is also expected to give a boost to the PPP in most parts of
Sindh.
Another
factor which the PPP hopes will help it not only maintain its grip but extend
its gains as well in Election 2018, compared to 2013, is the inclusion of
electable candidates – read powerful landlords – in the party. “It may not go
down well with the PPP’s ideological old-guards, but Asif Ali Zardari sahib
(former president and co-chairman of the PPP) himself took the lead to bring
powerful feudal lords within the party fold to ensure seats for the party in
the coming elections,” said a PPP insider requesting anonymity.
The
third factor, which is likely to help the PPP’s bid for a third consecutive
term to form the provincial government in Sindh and send members to the
National Assembly, is its influence over the civil administration. Although
there is a caretaker set-up, the neutrality of many administrative officers
remains doubtful because they have been cultivated and supported during the
past two terms of the PPP. All this gives a huge edge to the PPP.
However,
at least on paper, there are some big names and forces, including the Grand
Democratic Alliance (GDA), trying to challenge the PPP in its bastion of power,
but the prospect of their candidates giving a tough fight in the elections,
barring a few districts, appears bleak.
“There
is a strong negative sentiment against the PPP because of its poor performance,
but the GDA has failed to capitalise on this discontent,” says Dr. Jabbar
Khattak, chief editor and publisher of the leading Sindh-language daily, Awami
Awaz. “The anger against the PPP won’t transform into a wave because of the
lack of leadership.”
The GDA
comprises traditional anti-PPP forces including Pir Pagara’s Pakistan Muslim
League-Functional; Ayaz Latif Palijo’s Qaumi Awami Tehreek; the PPP’s Workers’
faction led by Naheed Khan and her spouse, Dr. Safdar Abbasi; Ghulam Murtaza
Jatoi’s National Peoples’ Party and Arbab Ghulam Rahim’s Peoples’ Muslim
League. Along with these groups, there are individuals like the powerful
landlord Ali Gohar Mahar in Ghotki and PPP dissidents, Dr. Zulfikar and Fehmida
Mirza in Badin and several others in various constituencies, who are supporting
the GDA. Some Sindhi nationalists, including Jalal Mohammed Shah, are also in
alliance with the GDA in select constituencies, along with the Pakistan
Tehreek-e-Insaaf.
Ayaz
Latif Palijo, the secretary general of the GDA, claimed that the anti-PPP
alliance would form the provincial government in Sindh. “Out of 25 districts in
Sindh, the GDA has a clear edge in at least 18,” he said while talking to Newsline.
“In Umerkot, Thar, Mirpurkhas, Badin, Sanghar, Naushero Feroze, Shikarpur,
Ghotki, Dadu and Jacobabad, we have a clear edge, while in Nawabshah, Sukkur,
Larkana, Qambar-Shahdadkot, Tando Allahyar and Hala we expect a neck-to-neck
fight,” he said.
However,
GDA detractors say that these great expectations do not reflect the ground
reality.
According
to Dr. Jabbar Khattak, the GDA secretary-general, Ayaz Palijo, himself does not
have a solid constituency. “The GDA comprises the same forces which failed to
make any impact in the past… the PTI factor has a nominal presence in Sindh.
Only Liaquat Jatoi and Shah Mehmood Qureshi are the two serious PTI candidates
in rural Sindh,” he said. “The parties and individuals comprising GDA have a
few pockets and can act as a pressure group but their presence is confined to
holding small demonstrations and issuing press statements.”
In the
2013 general elections, the PPP bagged 32 National Assembly seats out of 60,
while the parties comprising GDA and its allies got just eight, including PTI’s
lone seat from Karachi. MQM won 18 seats and one seat was won by the PML-N. For
the provincial assembly elections, the PPP got 94 seats in a house of 168,
while the parties within the GDA and its allies secured a total of 15 seats
including the reserved seats for women and the religious minorities. The MQM
and the PML-N won 50 and seven seats respectively.
In the
2008 elections, PPP won 33 National Assembly seats, while the parties now
comprising GDA and its allies won four. In those elections the MQM bagged 19
seats, while four seats went to PML-Q. In the provincial assembly, the PPP got
90 seats, while parties comprising GDA and its allies secured 11 seats. The
MQM, PML-Q and ANP won 50, 11 and two seats respectively.
Khattak
maintains that despite the PPP’s abysmal performance, its opposition stands on
a much weaker wicket. “For instance, the stature of the current Pir Pagara is
not that of his father. There are differences even within the Pagara family.
Unlike his father, who was good at bringing notables together, the current Pir
of Pagara lacks this capacity also… And let’s not forget that even the senior
Pir Pagara was defeated in the 1988 elections by PPP’s Pervez Ali Shah,” he
said. “The GDA is an alliance of convenience, which has many aspirants for the
chief ministership of the province. Moreover, the PPP has a far better
organisational structure compared to its rivals in rural Sindh and will be able
to bring in voters on election day.”
But
journalist and analyst, Manzoor Sheikh, who is affiliated with Mehran TV,
maintains that the anti-PPP forces in Sindh are expected to perform better than
in the last election. “GDA has emerged as an important faction and anti-PPP
forces are in a position to dominate at least seven to eight districts and give
a tough fight in several others. There have been new political alignments and
some powerful families which once supported the PPP, now stand on the other
side. I see an anti-PPP tide in Badin, Tando Jam, Tando Allahyar, Naushero
Feroze and Khairpur. I see tough competition in Sukkur as well where PPP’s
Khursheed Shah is running for a National Assembly seat, while his son and
nephew are campaigning for two provincial assembly seats which has created
resentment among the people.” However, said Sheikh, “The Bilawal
factor has been overplayed as people know that he is not in charge of the
party.”
In a
surprising development, a number of PPP candidates, including Nisar Khuhro,
Naveed Qamar and Murad Ali Shah, were either manhandled or aggressively
questioned by their constituents when they visited their constituencies. Even
Bilawal was not spared when he visited Lyari; his convoy was stoned. A sign of
the times perhaps, underlining a growing awareness among the voters who expect
their representatives to perform.
PPP
critics predict some nasty surprises for the party in the 2018 elections, but
given the track record and the absence of an effective leadership within the
opposition, it is likely to win Sindh for the third time in a row, albeit with
a slashed number of seats.
No comments:
Post a Comment